Research questions efficacy of mask mandates and COVID-19 vaccine

MASSACHUSETTS—Controversy continues to reign over the imposition of mask mandates and vaccines when it comes to COVID-19. Last week an article appeared on the Defender, an internet site dedicated to children’s health, by Madhava Setty, MD. Setty is a noted anesthesiologist with a bachelor’s degree from MIT in electrical engineering. In this article, Setty addresses the research of independent investigator, Electrical Engineer John Beaudoin, which he claims: “uncovered evidence that thousands of deaths in 2021 may have been linked to COVID-19 vaccines.”

In South Dakota, tribes continue to address the COVID pandemic with masks and vaccines. Despite hard evidence COVID-19 targets those over the age of fifty, and almost no children ever get beyond the asymptomatic stage, tribes accept the official COVID narrative as gospel. As one Pine Ridge woman, working to help stop the spread, said: “It doesn’t matter if just one child gets it, that’s one child too many.”

According to Setty, Beaudoin, “analyzed nearly seven years of Massachusetts death certificates he obtained through the Freedom of Information Act. ”

At this point Setty gets to the reason why Beaudoin’s finding matter: “Beaudoin’s findings demonstrate that the COVID-19 death toll in Massachusetts was largely confined to a short window of time in 2020, and that COVID-19 deaths in 2020 resulted from pulmonary causes — in contrast to COVID-19 deaths in 2021, which were more closely linked to illnesses of the heart and blood.”

Setty sums it up: “There is no reasonable way to explain how SARS-CoV-2 dramatically changed the way it attacks and kills human beings and why it did so at precisely the time the experimental mRNA inoculations were deployed.”

Setty points to a conference in Massachusetts in the summer of 2021, which was considered to be one of the first super spreader events in the country. Setty asserts: “…the vaccinated comprised a larger percentage of those who contracted COVID-19 than you would expect from a random sample of the county’s residents. Of those who were hospitalized in this outbreak, 80% were fully vaccinated. The ‘vaccines’ offered no protection against severe disease.”

More to the point, Setty writes: “…the vaccine did not offer any reduction in transmissibility”

Next, Setty addresses mask mandates. The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) found there was an increase in COVID-19 cases in Massachusetts school districts that lifted mask mandates.

According to the authors of the NEJM study, “…school districts with mask mandates had 39.9 fewer cases per 1,000 students over a 15-week period.”

But Setty poses the question, so what? Setty: “Although districts that continued to enforce mask mandates after the statewide mandate was dropped had a lower COVID-19 incidence rate, mask mandates did not eliminate the transmission of the disease. Those districts still had 60 cases per 1,000 students.”

Setty concludes: “Children are going to get COVID-19 whether they are forced to wear a mask or not. There is no longer a need to ‘flatten the curve’ until a miracle ‘vaccine’ can be developed at ‘warp speed.’ COVID-19 is a disease that will be with us for the foreseeable future. What is the point of such a study? To convince Massachusetts residents that a modest decrease in school days missed is worth the imposition of perpetual mask mandates upon their children?”

 

Next, Setty addresses the findings of Beaudoin, and his scrutiny of death certificates. “Official death certificates indicate that thousands of deaths in 2021 may have been linked to the COVID-19 vaccines. If they weren’t linked to these products, why and how has the SARS-CoV-2 virus found a different way to kill people in 2021 and 2022?”

Beaudoin’s study indicates an increase in the death of children after they were vaccinated. It notes a decrease in the death of people 85 an older but only because the first wave of COVID decreased this population. Did vaccines trigger a shift in COVID targets by increasing vulnerability in the vaccinated, and creating a circulatory threat rather than respiratory?

Beaudoin’s research appears to indicate that the vaccine was not effective at what it was designed to do, and that the mask mandates, although they reduce transmission, do not reduce contraction, as it still remains at 60 in 1000.

(Contact James Giago Davies at skindiesel@msn.com)

 

The post Research questions efficacy of mask mandates and COVID-19 vaccine first appeared on Native Sun News Today.

Visit Original Source